Department for Energy and Climate Change

Joint Transport and Environment Informal Council 14-15th April 2016

Amber Rudd: Today my noble hon Friend the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth) has made the following statement:I attended the Joint Transport and Environment Informal Council in Amsterdam on 14th and 15th April.The main focus of the meeting was on the future of European transport, the challenges in the transition to a zero-emissions economy and the steps that should be taken in the EU to develop a sustainable and smart transport and mobility system.On 14th April, Environment Ministers were invited to discuss ‘Green Mobility’ and the possibilities of hastening and scaling up the transition towards cleaner fuels and zero-emissions mobility. I outlined the UK’s approach to the future development of new car CO2 emissions regulation that promotes a quicker transition to low emission vehicles. In parallel, Transport Ministers were invited to discuss ‘Smart Mobility’ and asked in particular to offer reflections on the proposed Amsterdam Declaration on Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs), where Department for Transport officials offered support. Discussion focused on the ways Europe could adopt a more coordinated approach, to ensure the technologies would be developed with interoperability in mind and the main challenges with respect to legislation, Co-operative Intelligent Transport Systems, liability, data protection and privacy.Following lunch, I participated in a joint visit to an Innovation Expo showcasing more than 200 projects and innovative designs on various topics. I then attended a joint Transport & Environment interactive session on Innovating for the Future where Ministers were invited to explore future scenarios for smart and green mobility, and discuss their priorities for achieving these future scenarios.The following day, Transport & Environment Ministers were invited jointly to discuss the follow up to COP21 in International aviation and shipping. The focus was on how both Transport and Environment Ministers could best work together, and how Europe could contribute to negotiations at the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the International Maritime Organization (IMO). Overall, there was positive momentum during this discussion, with Ministers recognising the link between international aviation and shipping emissions and the long term goal set out in the Paris Agreement. In the context of the negotiations to agree a global market-based measure in ICAO, Ministers also recognised the importance of achieving carbon neutral growth of international aviation from 2020 and the inclusion of a review mechanism to increase ambition over time. There was strong support for progress in the IMO to agree a global system to collect data on fuel consumption of ships and subsequent development of a work plan to identify international shipping's fair share of global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.Transport Ministers also met to discuss how the transport sector is, or will be, affected by border controls in the Schengen area. This session touched on Transport Security presenting Member States with the opportunity to convey their condolences following the recent tragedy in Brussels and also to exchange views on transport security measures.


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS675

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

April Agriculture and Fisheries Council

Elizabeth Truss: My Hon friend, the Minister of State for Farming, Food and Marine Environment (George Eustice), represented the UK at the Agriculture and Fisheries Council on 11 April in Luxembourg.Two fisheries items were presented. Firstly by the Presidency, on the framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector. Commissioner Vella, DG Environment, presented the second item on the proposal on the conservation of fishery resources and the protection of marine ecosystems through technical measures. Most Member States, including the UK, welcomed moves to increase regionalisation and to simplify the legislation. The UK and Denmark mentioned the need to allow enough flexibility to take account of the development of new technologies and techniques.Moving on to Agriculture, Commissioner Katainen, DG SANTE, explained that there are opportunities for agriculture in the fund for investment and innovation for 2015-2018 in particular through the European Fund for Strategic Investment (EFSI). Member States generally welcomed the further financing options and were keen to explore how EFSI could be used. Commissioner Hogan, DG Agriculture, updated Member States on the market situation support measures. During this agenda item four related AOBs were addressed: the crisis in the dairy market; the modification of the implementation rules to be provided for the planned support scheme for the fruit and vegetable producers with regard to the embargo established by the Russian Federation; the extension of the final date for submission of aid applications; and, pig meat exports to the Russian Federation.There was a full round of interventions from Member States who maintained their existing positions on the market crisis. The UK, Denmark and Sweden stressed the need for longer term solutions, many of which are already underway such as the opening of new markets with international trade deals. The UK also referenced the work it is progressing with the European Investment Bank to help farmers manage global price volatility and manage risk.Any other business items Germany introduced the AOB item on combating food fraud in the EU, which was an update on a joint project undertaken by Europol and Interpol. There was support for the paper by 13 Member States, including the UK. Austria, supported by 12 other Member States, tabled an item on the negotiation of the Association Agreement between the European Union and Mercosur. The Commission highlighted the benefits of new trade deals and noted a new impact assessment is being prepared. Luxembourg introduced an item on the 38th Conference of EU Paying Agencies where it was concluded that audit procedures needed to be stabilised and longer term simplification needs to continue. The UK intervened, echoing calls for more proportional sanctions and simpler audits. Lithuania presented the outcome of the political forum on Rethinking the Food Supply Chain. It concluded that national laws should be used to strengthen supply chains.


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS674

Ministry of Defence

Service Complaints Ombudsman's 2015 Annual Report

Mark Lancaster: I am pleased to lay before Parliament today the Service Complaints Ombudsman’s annual report for 2015 on the fairness, effectiveness and efficiency of the service complaints system. This report is published by Nicola Williams as the first Service Complaints Ombudsman, having previously fulfilled the role of Service Complaints Commissioner during 2015. The report also covers the work of her office, and that of the Ministry of Defence, in preparing for the implementation of the new service complaints system on 1 January 2016. It concludes that the old process was still subject to delay and so not operating efficiently. The report acknowledges where each of the Services has made improvements in 2015 to the way in which they manage complaints. This approach to continuous improvement, along with implementing lessons learned and best practice, provides a solid foundation on which to introduce the new complaints system. This is a shorter and quicker process, and one which strengthens oversight and accountability through the powers of the new Ombudsman. Unlike in previous years, there are no new recommendations in this report. The Ombudsman has decided that as the new service complaints system was only introduced on 1 January 2016, it is only right to give it a period of time to operate before properly assessing its effectiveness. The Ombudsman’s annual report for 2016 will report on the performance of the new system in its first year, making any recommendations as appropriate. I will place a copy of my response to the Ombudsman in the Library of the House.

Department for Transport

Vehicle Emissions

Mr Robert Goodwill: I wish to inform the House that the Government has now concluded the Vehicle Emissions Testing Programme and we have published our findings. My Rt. Hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Transport informed the House on 10 November that we had established this important programme following the revelations that Volkswagen had been using software in their cars which caused the engines to behave differently during emissions tests, compared to real world driving. Not only has this caused disruption and distress to the 1.2m Volkswagen Group users in the UK, it showed a lack of regard for the serious health consequences of nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions and caused significant damage to the trust consumers have placed in car manufacturers across the country. It was vital that we immediately started a UK investigation into whether other manufacturers were using equivalent prohibited devices and more broadly to better understand why emissions results in the real world were significantly different from those tested under laboratory conditions. Our testing programme was designed to test a range of the best-selling passenger diesel cars. We selected an independent and representative sample of vehicles to test in a variety of conditions using the latest technology. We appointed Professor Ricardo Martinez-Botas, of Imperial College London, to provide independent academic oversight of the work. Importantly, the tests have not detected evidence of test cycle manipulation strategies as used by the Volkswagen Group from other manufacturers. However, tests have found higher levels of NOx emissions in test track and real world driving conditions than in the laboratory for all vehicles, with results varying significantly between different makes and models. Although the progressive tightening of European emissions standards has substantially reduced harmful pollutants from vehicles, existing laboratory tests designed to ensure these emissions limits are met have been shown to be inadequate. However we have already secured a tough new Real Driving Emissions test in EU legislation. From next year, vehicles will have to meet emissions limits in real driving conditions across a wide range of typical operating conditions. This will improve consumer confidence in manufacturers. The results from our testing programme further confirm that the UK was right to push for the early introduction of these tough new limits. Even before the introduction of the new limits, we are urging manufacturers to introduce new technologies to reduce emissions sooner than the new EU regulations require. Some manufacturers have announced that they intend to make changes to vehicles already in use, to improve emissions, and will offer this to customers on a voluntary basis. We welcome this and encourage action from other manufacturers. We will continue working to ensure that the new rules for Real Driving Emissions and Type Approval are robust, deliver the expected outcomes and that manufacturers behave consistently. In addition, this year the Department for Transport will be establishing a new programme of market surveillance testing which will seek to ensure that products entering our markets fully comply with the law. I am appearing at the Transport Select Committee’s enquiry into Vehicle Type Approval this afternoon where I will be happy to explain these findings further. I have placed copies of this Report in the libraries of both Houses.



Vehicle Emissions Testing
(PDF Document, 3.58 MB)





This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS678

Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Nuisance calls - requiring direct marketing callers to provide Calling Line Identification

Mr Edward Vaizey: My Honourable Friend the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Culture, Media and Sport (Baroness Neville-Rolfe) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.On 12 January 2016, the Government published a consultation seeking views on a proposal to amend the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (the 2003 Regulations) to make it a requirement for direct marketing callers to provide Calling Line Identification (CLI). This followed a commitment by the Government to impose such a requirement, subject to consultation, during the passage of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, and forms part of the Government’s strategy to tackle the problem of nuisance calls and to protect the vulnerable and elderly in society who are most impacted by this issue.I am today publishing the Government’s response to the consultation, a copy of which will be placed in the libraries of both Houses. The overwhelming majority of respondents to the consultation were in favour of the proposal and agreed that it would improve consumer choice and would make it easier for the regulator to take enforcement action against those who breach the rules. The consulatation can also be found here.I am therefore also laying before Parliament a statutory instrument amending the 2003 Regulations so as to implement the proposal. The requirement to provide CLI will come into force on 16 May 2016.The Government is clear that there is no silver bullet to the problem of nuisance calls, but we are committed to working closely with regulators, industry, consumer groups and others to raise awareness and develop practical solutions to this complex issue.



Calling Line Identification- consultation results
(PDF Document, 296.76 KB)





This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS677